Delev & Associates
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Before Extending Credit
    • Civil Litigation
    • Commercial Collections UCC
    • Consumer Collections
    • Consumer Resource Center
    • Creditors’ Rights
  • About
    • Gregory D. Delev
    • Brian T. Giles
    • Donald W. Harper
  • Articles
  • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page

Appeals Court: Debt collectors’ false statement must be relevant

by greg delev | Jul 17, 2015 | Business Litigation

Picture this: someone is driving through Cincinnati on I-71 at 100 mph and is pulled over by police. Using driver’s license information, the officer writes a speeding ticket, including the driver’s weight listed at 180 lb. on the license. Do you think a court would toss out the speeding ticket because it turns out that the driver actually weighs 185? Of course not. The person’s weight is immaterial; the speeding offense had nothing to do with the listed weight.

That same sort of common sense prevailed in a recent case before the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. The court ruled that a false statement made by a debt collector to a debtor must be material — must be relevant — in order for the debtor to take legal action against the collector under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

The FDCPA lists a wide array of impermissible types of misrepresentations in conversations and communications between collector and debtor — and those continue to be prohibited. However, the court made clear that an immaterial statement — such as an incorrect address or a misspelled company name or other immaterial information — will not allow debtors to escape their financial obligations.

The court ruled that the false statement only becomes actionable if it could affect decisions about the debt by the “least sophisticated debtor.” Let’s go back to our driving illustration for a moment. Would the “least sophisticated driver” expect to have their speeding ticket dismissed because the ticket misstated the driver’s weight? Of course not.

Could the “least sophisticated debtor” expect to have a debt forgiven because the county clerk’s address was misstated on a document or because of a typo in a company’s name? Again, no.

Hopefully, debtors harboring hopes of evading debts because of immaterial false statements will let go of those dreams and face up to their responsibilities without need for debt collection. If not, experienced Ohio debt collection attorneys are able to take effective actions to get payments for clients. Experienced attorneys will press debtors with pre-litigation collections, and vigorously pursue payment as well in litigation and post-judgment.

Recent Posts

  • Can you recover the costs for materials with a mechanic’s lien?
  • Retaining property from a borrower with financial troubles
  • How does foreclosure work in Ohio?
  • What are a creditors’ collection options?
  • What are the remedies for a contract breach?

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • Business Litigation
  • Commercial Collections
  • Contract Disputes
  • Firm News
  • Uncategorized

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed